Monday, September 15, 2014

Devil's Due

Devil's Due Movie Review

Newlyweds take off on a honeymoon to Europe, get a little wasted and wind up pregnant with Satan spawn.  At least I think that’s what happened in “Devil’s Due” directed by Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett.

This Satanic, possession tale is familiar territory for Bettinelli-Olpin and Gillett who co-directed the “V/H/S” finale “10/31/98,” arguably the best segment of the first V/H/S anthology.  Samantha McCall, played by adorable actress Allison Miller, and Zach McCall, played Zach Gilford, return from their honeymoon and soon find out that Samantha is pregnant—a shock to both considering she religiously takes birth control.  They share the news with friends and family and everyone is happy and excited except Samantha who slowly realizes something isn’t quite right with her pregnancy.  Long story short, she starts eating raw meat at the supermarket and killing wild animals with her barehands.  I know pregnant women get weird cravings but this lady goes overboard!
Much of the film is shot by her husband who bought a video camera and documents the entire ordeal which starts with joy and slowly degrades to satanic mayhem.  Don’t throw this one away as yet another found footage film because this movie also utilizes other peoples cameras and surveillance video to help push the story along much like the movie “Chronicle.”  The story is told by using all cameras within the world of the couple, not just the handheld camera used by the husband.  I don’t mind this device, frankly I don’t really think it’s that noticeable unless you’re writing a movie review or picking it apart because you think you’re a film conossieur because you know how to illegally download movies on the internet (we will get to that later.)  What I really didn’t like is how we were the only one actually watching this footage; the husband never once took a look at what he was shooting.  There was tons of weird stuff going on that he would've seen if he just uploaded his footage and tried to edit it—if youre not going to edit or even watch your footage what the hell is the point of filming at all?

I'll tell you why, because we have to suspend our disbelief and it’s scary, plain and simple.  I think society has gotten use to the herky jerky camera style made famous by the “Blair Witch Project” and no one is getting motion sickness anymore but everyone seems to pan these movies immediately when they are released.  As a film watcher we become accustomed to certain things like someone looking in a mirror on a medicine cabinet, opening the medicine cabinet, grabbing something and then closing it, revealing a killer or something spooky in the reflection behind them.  We have all seen it a million times and we begin to anticipate these kinds of things when we see them developing in a film.  The documentary style coupled with a demonic possession tale means that, at any time, some wild stuff could happen and you could be scared out of your wits.  I found this happening to me many times—“oh boy, when he walks in the room with that camera she’s going to be eating the dog or something!”  These parts were excellent and kept even Gory Gary on the edge of his seat (or bed, I watched it in bed.)

Let’s move onto the acting: as I did research I read through a lot of other reviews and message boards and found that a lot of people think they are experts on acting.  How?  What exactly does a person who does not act, and has no experience with acting or filmmaking know about a very, very difficult skill?  “Oh, the acting was terrible….the acting sucked…blah blah blah.”  You know nothing about acting and you’re just trying to fill your dumb review with more words and that’s the obvious thing for you to talk about because expounding on anything else or even having an educated thought would make your head explode!  Everyone is entitled to their opinion but take it from me, if there is a big budget film being made, the directors and actors are top-notch talent and they will get it right, just like they did in this film.  The husband and wife do an excellent job and practically carry the entire movie dealing with some pretty difficult subject matter.  It’s not like they’re in a comedy where they are just some funny girl or dude in a relationship that just doesn’t seem to work out….awww SHUCKS!!  They are newlyweds having to act like they are in love, having to act like they are having their first child and dealing with the god damn ANTICHRIST!  Please, Stinky Kubrick, sitting at your computer in your underwear, looking through torrent downloads while you recuperate from your last masturbation session—tell me how they should have acted.  I have a post coming up in a few weeks about acting and why it is such a difficult thing to judge, so stay tuned for more vitriol aimed at these armchair actors and film directors.


“Devil’s Due” is Rated R, has a run time of 89 minutes and gets a 2.5 stars on the gore score.  This film didn't take us anywhere we haven’t already been but did its best to be inventive and definitely delivered some scary moments.  It did leave us wondering, however, about the title....what exactly is the Devil Due?  Is it a play on words?  Like "due" date?  I dunno, definitely give this one a watch, fright fiends, and be weary of other reviewers; the only thing many of them got correct is they liked this movie better the first time when it was called "Rosemary's Baby."



No comments:

Post a Comment